LETTER: Don’t Take a Chance on Artificial Turf at Western Middle School
Submitted by Susan Rudolph, Greenwich, Member of Greenwich Sustainability Committee, Co-Founder Real Grass for Healthy Kids!
Why does the plan for removing and managing toxic soil at Western Middle School (WMS) include putting toxic plastic that contains PFAS back on the fields? This makes no sense.
The remediation plans for WMS submitted by Langan Engineering describe removing most of the contaminated soil, capping the area with clean fill, geotextile fabric, crushed stone and finishing it by installing artificial turf (AT). Topping the school playing field with a blanket of plastic that creates an ecological dead zone is a bad solution when better options exist! The EPA, for example, describes cases of isolating contaminated soil and then planting natural grass on the top layer.
A deeper look shows a complex picture, one that refutes the marketed benefits of AT and instead reveals the life-altering hazards it creates. At the same time, there is growing evidence that natural grass fields contribute to vital ecological functions and the wellbeing of humans. For all of these reasons, the Greenwich Sustainability Committee supports the use of real grass not artificial turf.
Don’t be fooled by the plastic industry’s claims as they push their toxic artificial turf product on cities, schools, and towns all across the country. There is extensive data debunking the claims that artificial turf playing fields are a “green” or less costly alternative to grass. Here are some of the facts:
And there’s more. Microplastics are created during both AT production and usage. They are not biodegradable, and exposure can lead to hormone disruption, organ damage, and a weakened immune system. Unfortunately, here again young children are most highly vulnerable. For all athletes, reports show a higher rate of non-contact knee, foot, or ankle injuries on AT than on grass.
Studies by reputable scientists and laboratories, i.e., those not funded by the fossil fuel or plastics industry, are clear that materials in AT contain carcinogens. When children are exposed to this day after day, week after week, the chances of dangerous health issues are increased, and the serious effects to our air, land and water are frightfully imminent.
As a community, how much risk to our children’s health and our local environment are we willing to tolerate in the name of field time? As a concerned citizen with three grandsons currently in Greenwich public schools, there is only one answer… none.
"Although I disagree that it is going too far to invite DeSantis to speak here ( First Amendment and all that) I suggest that the RTC use it as an opportunity to question and challenge his policies and certainly his hate-leaning statements on gender and race." - Eileen Simonson
View all Letter to the Editor Posts →the Greenwich Sustainability Committee supports the use of real grass not artificial turf.Environmental ImpactHuman HealthThe Cost MythLiabilityAs a community, how much risk to our children’s health and our local environment are we willing to tolerate in the name of field time?View all Letter to the Editor Posts →